23 Feb
2010
23 Feb
'10
3:40 p.m.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:01 PM, <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:35:42PM +0300, alex stone
wrote:
Yes, i've just discovered the delay. No problem with that. i'd rather
have a better quality, than haste. I'll use 2 instances of JC as per
your recommendation.
Any recommendations for a delay? I've found a couple in the ladspa
collection, but so far they're not up to my particular task.
Thanks for the help.
Alex.
--
www.openoctave.org
midi-subscribe(a)openoctave.org
development-subscribe(a)openoctave.org
So in this case, i would run 2 instances of
jconvolver, one for the
tail, and one for the UHJ conf?
One for the reverb and one for the UHJ encoder.
In theory you *could* combine them into a single
configuration, just use separate ins/outs for
each part. I wouldn't recommend doing this.
Note that the UHJ encoder has a delay of 2048
samples, the price to pay for a very accurate
90 degrees phase shifter. This could be decreased,
but would require a shorter Hilbert transform
IR which is not provided in the current release.
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !