4 Aug
2009
4 Aug
'09
8:04 a.m.
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 11:21:34 Chris Cannam wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Frank
Barknecht<fbar(a)footils.org> wrote:
Ah, okay. Mixed these two up in my head.
That the problem when your day-to-day-work uses LGPL for libs and GPL for
apps...
Good to have peer-reviewers that are checking for wrong facts written before
the first coffee. :-)
Arnold
Hallo,
Arnold Krille hat gesagt: // Arnold Krille wrote:
Arnold's explanation is approximately true of the LGPL rather than
the
GPL, so perhaps that's the confusion here. The LADSPA header is
indeed under the LGPL, but the plugins in question are generally under
the GPL -- so terms and conditions of our normal flamefests apply. Please be aware that (last time I checked) the
gpl doesn't talk about
giving access to all gpl-code you use. Only if you change something you
have to make your changes available for free.
Huh? I think, you're confusing
something here. Is it too early in the
morning?