On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 12:41:36 +0200, Tim Goetze
wrote:
other than that, i'm eager to know how plugin
ports are to be
referenced in the metadata file. by ID or numerical index? if by ID,
is it the full path to the port: "/SupaPlug/LFO 1/Frequency", or
something more concise? (i'm for a full path scheme because it
allows the plugin writer to reorder ports painlessly.)
I think thats an open question, it depends on the metadata language - RDF
has some sequence primatives, but I prefer not to use them.
In lrdf you call the ports <foo>.0, <foo>.1 etc. where <foo> if the URI
of
the plugin. It doesnt really matter how you do it.
How about <foo>/port/0, <foo>/port/1, etc.?
Slashes are a natural separator for forming URI's. The plugin writer
can organize them as desired.
--
joq