On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:14:01AM -0800, Len Ovens wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020, Manuel Haible wrote:
> So low latency is important but sample accuracy
not so much.
The time-shift of sample-streams would be different on each start
up, right?
Yes, It depends on how long it takes the bridge to start up and when it gets
started. If the setup is started by a script, it depends on system load
pretty much.
(Assuming this is about zita-ajbridge)
No, zita-j2a and a2j measures the relative timing of Jack and Alsa periods
when starting up. With the -S option (no resampling, assuming word clock
sync), this is a single observation and there may be some remaining error.
With resampling (no -S) the added latency will converge to a defined value,
with only some jitter around this remaining.
Would it be a
good idea to apply an aliasing-filter before feeding the
zita-resampler?
No.
Indeed no, the anti-aliasing filter is part of the resampling process.
To the OP: please, no HTML on this list !
Ciao,
--
FA