19 Jun
2006
19 Jun
'06
8:57 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:25:52PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
Not a problem. AFAIK, the hints do not describe the v->f mapping,
but rather the one between the widget and v. It's plain linear in
this case.
I'd love a plugin host with a degree...
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:58:43PM +0200, Fons
Adriaensen wrote:
Aaarrrrrggghhh :-)
What worries me is that LV2 is *not* going to
solve the problem that
DR raised w.r.t. my "Moog" filter plugins.
This particualr one I'm not worried about, as it's a know one, its all the
subtle things noones realised yet, something like a plugin that does its
delay in 24ths of a beat or something. So the
relation v->f is *exponential* (not logarithmic).
Sure, the LADSPA LOG hint couldn't deal with this meaningfully anyway. - it has a
degree in music science and DSP,
- the meaning of the tags used is predefined by some standard.
Or both if you really mess up :) :somePort lv2:unit unit:octavePitch ;
lv2:baseFreq 264.0 .
It's not beyond the realms of the possible to describe the mathematical
relationship between the octave pitch unit and Hz, but it's probably
excessive.
A well-designed set of tags like the ones you show above would
probably solve 99.9% of all cases. But you can't expect anyone
to dream that up in a day. Which leads me to my main gripe with
LV2: it was defined much too fast. In a normal RFC process, you
present the problem, give interested parties at least a month
to consider it and write something that exceeds the quality of
a whim, and then take at least as much time to study the results
and comment on them before anything is decided.
--
FA
Follie! Follie! Delirio vano e' questo!