4 Nov
2011
4 Nov
'11
6:23 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Emanuel Rumpf <xbran(a)web.de> wrote:
While this is restrictive, in the way you mention, I
think it's a
welcome simplification
( compared to implementing a real-time-capable-linked-list + other
rt-structures ),
if your use-case doesn't require direct calls to the list (for any reason),
then you could request insert/remove/update operations through the
rt-ring-buffer.
you can't perform insert/remove/update operations on a "normal" linked
list in an RT thread.