12 Mar
2011
12 Mar
'11
1:21 a.m.
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 19:40 +0100, Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
I am deliberately trying to avoid doing that bit of work, because I'll
get lost off in la-la computer science land making data structures and
benchmarking them and stuff, and not making the LAD related releases I
really need to be making.
... I do enjoy that la-la land though. Soon enough. :)
-dr
On 03/11/2011 07:22 PM, David Robillard wrote:
From the docs I see that using GModule only adds Windows support
Well, yeah. "Portable" usually means "have to deal with *%&$#
windows",
otherwise straight POSIX would be fine :)
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 12:08 +0100, Olivier
Guilyardi wrote:
I will
try and submit a patch to remove glib. It'll take some time because I
have dozens of other things to do, but I will work on this. I had a quick look
at sord, it seems it only needs glib's sequence and hash table. Is this correct,
or will you need some more utilities?
Overall I need sequence, hash table (or hash table like thing, I'll
probably use a radix tree), and module loading (currently still POSIX in
SLV2). , unless you
also care about HP-UX. So, a small abstraction layer around dlopen() and
LoadLibrary() should suffice, no?
Yep
No rush, I may
make the relevant lib myself soon if you don't beat me to
it, I just don't want to hold up the next release for it.
No rush here as well. I can work on a patch, but on the other side I don't want
to interfere if you're in the middle of your work.