24 Oct
2002
24 Oct
'02
9:31 a.m.
Lea Anthony wrote:
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 01:12, Tim Goetze wrote:
graphics should not be a problem (bitmap blits don't
create relevant cpu load on recent systems). a rough
figure for the system's total cpu load for every effect
running on its own (if that is possible) would be a good
start.
if you don't run "ms access" or other busy-waiting apps
in the background the system part of the cpu load should
be negligible.
Lea Anthony wrote:
It's a windows app so I don't know how much extra overhead windows adds
on per submodule. Getting a pure cpu usage for the submodules will be
hard, but an approximation is not much of a problem. Have you guys heard amplitube? Man, those sounds
rock!
haven't heard it yet, no.
if you happen to use it, it'd be very interesting to hear
how much cpu load the different sub-modules generate. Also, I must ask this, how much of the LAD stuff is
designed with 32bit
audio in mind? I ask because that's what I work in, then dither down to
16bit when mastering.
most of what i do is 64 internally and 32 for inter-module
exchange.
tim