27 Jan
2010
27 Jan
'10
4:32 p.m.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:02:39PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
for some more anecdotal evidence, this is about what i
was seeing during
my jack1/2 comparison tests. jack2 generally required one buffer size
step more to achieve the same xrun robustness as jack1. but i'm
generally able to use much lower latencies down to 64 (or 128 in the
jack2 case), unless i use jconvolver, which forces me to go to at least
1024 so as not to max out the cpu.
That doesn't make much sense. You can instruct jconvolver
to use a minimum period size that is larger than the one
Jack* is running.
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !