15 Mar
2005
15 Mar
'05
7:36 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:22:50PM +0100, martin rumori wrote:
hi arnold,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:12:19PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
There was some months ago, as thats where liblo's pattern matching code
came from.
I had a look into Steve Harris' liblo and
libOSC++. The later seems more
appealing to me since I am a C++-Guy.
two years ago, i added the network classes (Inet*) to libOSC++, fixed
some bugs, cleaned up a bit... the library was used in different
projects (http://listen.gmd.de, http://www.grenzenlosefreiheit.de,
plus the wiretap thing of the original libOSC++ developers) and
appeared to be stable.
BUT: as far as i know, there is not much development ongoing at the
moment, and i ever planned some redesign for the whole library (i
don't consider using a std::string as container for an osc message as
a nice example for object oriented design...), but unfortunetaly there
wasn't enough time... just some background information concerning libOSC++.
be sure to pick
the "fraunhofer" branch if using it. there is a download page at
http://libosc.rumori.de
but i guess that liblo might be the better choice, it's in vivid
development and used by much more projects than libOSC++, plus the
clean and rock solid design with the steve harris (R) guarantee...
*cough* well the design may be ok in places, but the codebase is not
exactly bug-free :)
- Steve