27 Jan
2011
27 Jan
'11
5:37 p.m.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [LAD] OpenOctaveMidi2 (OOM2) beta release
From: Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>
To: Christopher Cherrett <ccherrett(a)openoctave.org>
Cc: linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
Date: 01/27/2011 09:32 AM
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Christopher
Cherrett
<ccherrett(a)openoctave.org> wrote:
OK, it was muse2. So
get ready :)
--
Christopher Cherrett
ccherrett(a)openoctave.org
http://www.openoctave.org
It is no secret that it was muse2. They suggested
we fork. We wanted to stay
with them.
Neither Muse nor Muse2 are mentioned anywhere on your website. I asked
only that you acknowledge the project that you forked, nothing more.
There was no anger, just a request that when forks are done, they are
acknowledged, out of respect for the work that was put into the
ancestor. This is a common practice (see LibreOffice for a recent
example) and I'm confused why my request would cause remarks like "you
need to settle down there" and "get a grip".