Re: [LAD] Feature requests: add JackSession support

i feel that if you spend too long reasoning about this, you will conclude, as I have, that JACK was actually a mistake (at least in terms of the basic framework in which to glue together different things processing data streams). the absence of a plugin API that was likely to be adopted by all/most developers back in 2000 is what gave rise to this situation. there's a limit to how far you can push the usability of a "DAW" built out of N independent processes, each one running code developed by different developers with no awareness of the others. the limit is, thankfully, not too primitive, but its also not far enough out to be able to pretend that JACK + N>1 clients is actually functionally equivalent to a single host + plugins, at least not in terms of state management.