4 Aug
2009
4 Aug
'09
6:18 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:33:22AM +0100, Nick Bailey wrote:
Well, calling it your own is out of order, but as long
as they release their
source code as required by the GPL, then selling it is a Good Thing (TM). I
hope the LADs agree with me. I would certainly be delighted if my GPL'd stuff
(which isn't directly related to LAD) got sold. It would mean more GPL'd
applications.
Two question arise:
- Is a program that loads LADSPA plugins (at run time) a
'derived work' ? Note that anyone can create a 'clean'
version of ladpsa.h, as some people did with the VST
headers.
- If an installer (run on the end user's machine)
fetches the plugins from their official site, would
this be 'distribution' ?
My first guess would be no, no.
Ciao,
--
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia รจ troppo stretta e lunga.