19 Sep
2008
19 Sep
'08
5:16 a.m.
hi kjetil!
Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Thanks to all. Those sounds like good arguments.
I'm still a little bit reluctant against wavex
though, because googling for the wavex format
hardly gives any relevant hits.
But I guess it's better than wav anyway, so
I'm going to change something. Are you sure
there's no other format that might be a
better alternative than wavex?
And I also wonder if wavex are able
to handle >4GB files? (I couldn't find
any spec about the format on the net)
Because if wavex is not able to handle
more than 4>GB files I have to enable
the same workaround as for wav files.
fwiw, steve harris used .w64 for his timemachine application. haven't
looked into it myself, but i recall someone over on the sursound mailing
list saying that it was quite sane.
maybe steve will chime in if he reads this...
best,
jörn
--
jörn nettingsmeier
home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/
http://spunk.dnsalias.org
phone://+49/201/491621
Kurt is up in Heaven now.