6 Aug
2009
6 Aug
'09
12:32 p.m.
On Thursday 06 August 2009 09:59:39 Chris Cannam wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:23 PM, drew
Roberts<zotz(a)100jamz.com> wrote:
Pure BS. People who cannot read the GPL properly.
Raymond
On Thursday 06 August 2009 03:51:30 you wrote:
Yes, exactly. The second question becomes broadly irrelevant
here if we are
prepared to accept Bob did convey his intention that the Impro-Visor
code be GPL'd, but Arnout and I were responding to the blanket "use of
GPL code makes it GPL" (which would imply the second question above).
And this I certainly agree with. Use of GPL code does not automatically
make another program GPL. It just gives the author of that code a legal
headache if the new program is not GPL.