14 Nov
2011
14 Nov
'11
7:28 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Iain Duncan <iainduncanlists(a)gmail.com> wrote:
HI Dave, I would def be more interested in checking it
out if it were LGPL
or MIT or somesuch. As I'm sure you know, Csound went LGPL a number of years
ago now, and that definitely increased uptake in the long run. Like Harry, I
just never know what use I might put some code to, so have a bit of a
kneejerk be-careful reaction to GPL.
just to be clear, CSound went LGPL *from* the ridiculous "MIT
educational license". that was a license that made its source code all
but unusable (and at the very least, extremely unclear as to its
usability).