29 Dec
2009
29 Dec
'09
5:27 a.m.
2009/12/29 torbenh <torbenh(a)gmx.de>de>:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:05:01PM +0800, Ray Rashif
wrote:
No Torben, that included a comparison because I noted what the poster
was looking for. Nothing more, nothing less. The poster is educated,
so we should have no problems with "flamewars". Sorry if it sounded as
such, will use better phrasing next time.
--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
Aside from that, we have to forget about
everything that has anything
to do with GTK+. None of what you look forward to is even remotely
possible with the examples and advice given so far (I mean just one
look at libphat is..urghhh just another gtk design).
Flashy and elegant is Qt's forte, because LMMS has done it. Your
resulting app can be simple, good-looking, skinnable. There's EFL, but
no-one knows whether it's even usable for multimedia.
what is this ? gui flamewars ?
idiots.