8 Nov
2009
8 Nov
'09
4:06 p.m.
On 7 Nov 2009, at 20:15, Chris Cannam wrote:
2009/11/7 Jörn Nettingsmeier
<nettings(a)folkwang-hochschule.de>de>:
I think Steve may be thinking of the inflammatory subject of how you
identify plugins, not ports. I'm pretty sure LADSPA ports are always
by number.
Oh you're right, brain fart on my part.
Still the port ID in LV2 was a hangover from LADSPA, which was my main
point.
- Steve
This was
a hangover from LADSPA, which had confusing and
contradictory
claims about what should/shouldn't be used to identify ports.
I still don't think there's consensus there.
can you elaborate on this?
archive links would be good, too.