On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter L Jones wrote:
* MidiMan Delta Audiophile 2496 (Envy24)
* Creative SB PCI 128 (ES1371)
I've used both of these extensively with JACK
and numerous other ALSA apps
and they work really well (full-duplex, low-latency use). Other
Heh. Now, one of
these I have in my machine ((PII vintage) Celeron 400)
already. The other would set me back £150. Your comment makes me think
there's little to choose between them. So, simply upgrading my soundcard
from a £15 low end consumer-oriented unit to something costing 10 times the
price looks like getting me nothing. Or am I missing something? :-(
Well, yes. ES1371 brings you 2ch in+out with max 48000Hz sampling rate,
and 16bit sample resolution. Midiman 2496 on the other hands provides up
to 96kHz sampling rate, 24bit sample resolution, 2ch in+out and digital
in+out. Check the specs from manufacturer's site.
And btw, I confused Audiophile with Delta44 (which I have, has 4ins +
4outs, no digital in/out). Both are based on the envy24 chipset, should
perform equally well. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
- GUS MAX
(this very, very old ISA-card can still beat a number of
today's crappy chipsets... I don't know whether to cry or laugh ;))
I
noticed that the ENS1371 seems to have a better rating on one site I looked
than to EMU10K, so this doesn't surprise me!
Yup, I'll probably never get tired of the following slogan: "sb128
(ens1371) is the best creative card as it's the one they didn't make
themselves". :) Ok, maybe the current SB cards are better, but I'll
never forgive the company the disappointment their AWE64Gold caused me.
Such waste of money! ;)
All in all,
most of the PCI-cards supported by ALSA have fairly good
drivers.
But how do I compare one card with another? What should I be looking
for?
How can I tell which will reduce the load on my computer and which will
increase the load? Is there any difference?
Well, it depends on what you want to do. How many channels you need in
and/or out, do you need high-quality recording, do you need digital
ins/out, do you need hardware support for multi-open, etc, etc?
I'm not a hardware expert so I can't answer to all these questions, but I
can tell about the criteria I used when I selected my last card. My
primary use is multitrack recording and mixing. I needed capability to
record >2 channels, high-quality a/d and good support for low-latency and
full-duplex. My choice was midiman delta44. It has 4 ins, an external
a/d&a/d box (important for high-quality conversion), good ALSA drivers and
wasn't too expensive (ie. a lot cheaper that the RME cards for instance).
So far I've been very satisfied with this purchace.
PS Let's cross-post to linux-audio-user. That and alsa-user are
probably the best forums for this discussion.
--
http://www.eca.cx
Audio software for Linux!