On 13 April 2011 12:44, James Morris <jwm.art.net(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 April 2011 12:42, Rui Nuno Capela
<rncbc(a)rncbc.org> wrote:
please read your qjackctl/about box whether
there's a "JACK Session support
disabled" written in red. that should say it all
Yeah, that says it all :/ Doh. Thanks.
...
The ARCH qjackctl package needs to be rebuilt against the newer JACK
then... ? The release date of the ARCH package is a couple of days
after the release of the recent QjackCtl. Will QjackCTL cope if it was
built with JACK Session support (on machine x) but running (on machine
y) against a JACK without session support?
Cheers,
James.
James.