14 Mar
2006
14 Mar
'06
3:37 p.m.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:56:47PM +0100, torbenh(a)gmx.de wrote:
no, it was a joke.
course it
would be perfectly valid for netjack
to use little endian `on the wire'; but this would be like
putting my powerbook in little endian mode when playing a
wav file. sort of.
so you say that i should not htonl the floats i copy from
my net buffer to the jack-port ? i doubt, this is a great performance impact.
i doubt that too.
when i change the packet format next time, i could
change that to byte
swap on a PPC. but considering that PPCs are generally slower than x86
nowadays, this would create more cpu load on a jack-network.
i don't think that's measurable either because the byte swap
is probably not the main source of overhead. besides, i'm on
ppc, so plz plz don't change it :)
thanks for netjack!
<sk>