8 Jun
2005
8 Jun
'05
6:56 p.m.
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 21:41 +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2005 21:35, Jussi Laako wrote:
Abovementioned template is not based on STL... About the STL; there are
number of different implementations of std::vector<> in different C++
RTLs, so one cannot expect anything specific except the interface from
it. It may, or may not, be slow, but it's not C++'s fault.
--
Jussi Laako <jussi.laako(a)pp.inet.fi>
You can derive a new class from the template and
overload the []
operator to perform exactly same as in C. After compilation the
result is the same no matter if the template or C array is used.
Are you sure this is still true in the gcc world, after they changed
vector from an array to a real class in gcc 3.3 or whenever it was?