4 Apr
2012
4 Apr
'12
11:22 p.m.
On Wed, 2012-04-04 at 21:59 +0200, rosea.grammostola wrote:
[...]
I think it's essential to the discussion to get
the cards on the
table, so everybody can make up his own mind and decides which SM is the
best solution for the Linuxaudio session puzzle. It would be nice if we
could reach agreement on this, but it's a free world indeed. :)
With apologies in advance, here are my cards:
It would be nice if this list could stick to actual
developer/development problems. I just spent quite some time catching
up on this thread, and almost nothing at all of value (i.e. something
towards solving the/a problem) has been contributed since last I
checked. Mostly just a bunch of wannabe bureaucracy political noise,
which only obscures any actual technical points that might need fleshing
out (i.e. it's actively hurting, not helping). I doubt I'm the only one
interested in the problem who's just given up on this thread because the
signal:noise ratio is ridiculous.
Take the politics to LAU or something. The official resolution of the
User Committee on The Agreed-Upon Solution for LAD Session Management
will have zero impact on what developers actually implement, but
dragging the signal:noise ratio into the gutter might - though probably
not the impact you were hoping for.
-dr