26 Jan
2010
26 Jan
'10
9:23 a.m.
Hi,
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 13:33:52 Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Arnold Krille wrote:
I don't know but this sounds a bit stupid to me. You want the random numbers
to have differences. Playing the same note again on a real piano or violin
still produces different sounds each time. So I would expect a synth using
random numbers for variety to behave the same and not give me exactly the same
each time I hit that note.
But regardless at how the seeds are initialized, when you use a special seed
for each note, you are very much effected by correlation of the random numbers.
When using the same seed for all notes, the access to the seed gets randomized
as soon as you hit two notes together. Which reduces the effect of bad random
numbers.
And you can't really use scientific random number generators because you want
to be fast and have realtime with the synth, so you are bound to have some
strange effects from the random numbers.
Arnold
I don't (yet) get the reason for doing this.
If the global seed is
initiated with time() it is the same as if each notes seed is initiated
with time(), the
*Is* each note being seeded with time()??
I got the impression that the seeds were being saved and
repeated. The reason why /that/ might make sense is if the
PRNG is being used for some kind of modulation effect -- and
then all the notes would have an identical "sound."