13 Jun
2010
13 Jun
'10
1:26 a.m.
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:09:12AM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
On 2010-06-13, at 00:00, fons(a)kokkinizita.net wrote:
OK, let me rephrase the question: why are such ambiguous
or misleading 'symbols' being used ?
And since I'm now talking to one of the experts:
Can an LV2 extension redefine everything except the
mimimum required for discovery ? This includes the
way ports are described, the way the host is supposed
to call the plugin etc. ?
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
Half of the URLs quoted above refer to inexistent
pages.
That's bad karma, but not essential.
What is the purpose of 'http://' in that
case ?
They're just symbols.