18 Oct
2006
18 Oct
'06
8:52 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 06:50:39PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
A lead guitarist will often deliberately play a harmonic `squeal'
in a lead solo (particularly in rock and metal). As a guitarist myself,
I fairly frequently generate fundamentals of around 4 kHz. Deliberate
use of higher frequencies than that might not be very common, but
the equipment should at least deal with it gracefully.
The fact remains that a lot of high end professional users consider many
of the free software plugins to be "nearly unusable" (see Ben Loftis'
earlier post in this thread). This isn't intended as a criticism of the
developers, just an acknowledgement that perhaps more attention needs to be
paid to some fairly subtle aspects of design that have not been
considered important up to now, if these high end users are to take
Linux audio more seriously.
John
John Rigg wrote:
Yes but my point is that the resulting aliasing sounds worse than the
harmonic distortion.
Soft clipping always sounds better than hard
clipping, and there are
analog compressors that behave like this. Unfortunately even a soft
clipper generates significant harmonic distortion, largely 3rd and 5th.
But this should only be happening on transients and the clipping
should stop as soon as the attack portion of the compression
process kicks in. Most instruments with fast transients usually
*already* have a high
levels of higher harmonics (and inharmonics) that die away far more
quickly than the lower harmonics.
True, but those are removed by the anti-aliasing filters in
the ADCs. The problem here is harmonics generated _inside_ the digital
domain. Once they're generated it's too late to filter them out, as
the aliasing has already occurred.
The 3rd
harmonic alone potentially increases the signal bandwidth by
three times
Ok, lets say we're sampling at 44.1kHz, which makes the highest
3rd harmonic we can represent is 22.0/3 kHz which is about 7kHz.
Do you really listen to many instruments where the fundamental
is at 7kHz?????