On Jan 7, 2010, at 19:41, Steve Fosdick wrote:
Of course the rich and powerful get high on the power
and get excited
about making money but if we refuse to do what is good for the planet
and therefore what is good for our children and grandchildren because we
suspect the motives of those with the power to make a difference we are
throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Much of the western world is capitalist to one degree or another and it
works because those with the money and motivation to make more money can
do so by providing things the rest of us either need or enjoy and we are
therefore prepared to pay for.
The big challenge for green initiatives is how to frame them in such a
away that the rich and powerful can get richer from them than from
things that are less green; that way the green choice will be taken by
those with the power to make a big difference. In turn, the way we as
individuals do that is to buy greener products and services and avoid
those that are less green so the greener ones become more profitable.
Steve.
you got a point there: assuming that the ecosystem is in danger (not knowing) is still
better than ignoring the possibility and *oops* kill all mankind in the process.
the problem that i see persists though: when the believers, fools and fundamentalists
support a war against air-polluting countries in the name of saving the planet they
actually supported death and not life. if you think that this is just some crazy
imagination of mine: remember 9/11. many americans realizing it's real suppose now,
when it's too late (
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry0U7cbPXys). let's not let
something like that happen again.
if i have the choice, i'll go green. but it's not something i believe in and it is
not something to fight for.
Jan