24 Jan
2008
24 Jan
'08
2:25 p.m.
"alex stone" <compose59(a)gmail.com> writes:
we just want to avoid somebody to directly make money
with our work,
that is by selling our software in a sampler product like a sampler
+ sample library bundle, a hardware sampler or something equivalent,
at least not without giving something back to the open source
Community."
But that's really the funny thing here. Your software isn't from the
free/open source software communities. It doesn't conform to neither
the free software definition nor the open source definition.
I'm glad that GPLv3 fixes this issue, cause if you state that the
software is under GPLv3 you may not impose any further restrictions on
the work, if I read the license correctly.
--
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s a
http://www. s t n m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
sip:b0ef@ e e
jid:b0ef@ n n