28 May
2004
28 May
'04
3:58 p.m.
"Ivica Ico Bukvic" <ico(a)fuse.net> writes:
Forgot to add that my assumption is (in addition to my
previous
statement) if JACK was then running using reasonably small buffers
the drift would be then minimized if not alleviated since JACK is
one that is dispatching the buffers at appropriate time, right?
JACK expects there to be *no* drift and does *nothing* to manage this
problem. It can only work with high-end cards using word-clock or
other sample-accurate synchronization. Probably someone has succeeded
with that (though I can't recall a specific report).
--
joq