13 Aug
2015
13 Aug
'15
10:50 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:21:58AM +0100, Simon Jenkins wrote:
That's a matter of opinion :-) A typo, forgetting to cover some
corner case, being off by 1 in a loop etc. etc. I'd call bugs.
Using the wrong algorithm is in a different class.
It also means that this was never seriously tested.
On 13 Aug 2015, at 08:10, Stéphane Letz
<letz(a)grame.fr> wrote:
I am surprised also JACK1 does no do topological sort which obviously is the needed
way...
Jack1 was always trying to do a topological sort, but it turns out
the algorithm chosen doesn’t always achieve one. This is a bug not
a mis-feature: The surprise is that it took well over a decade for
anyone to spot it.
Partly because in many cases you wouldn't notice a period
delay, or even several periods. It makes nonsense of any
latency compensation schemes etc. of course.
And I can assure you that it's not very rewarding to chase
a suspected bug in your own software for days on end because
you happen to be the type of fool who *does* do some testing
before releasing anything, only to discover that it's not
your 'bug' at all.
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)