12 Dec
2004
12 Dec
'04
9:04 a.m.
Kai Vehmanen <kvehmanen(a)eca.cx> writes:
My suggestion is that we drop this policy altogether:
announcements should
be sent to LAA and optionally to LAD and/or LAU. At least I've always had
the nasty feeling that I'm spamming LAD+LAU with my Ecasound release
announcements. Of course, when announcing conferences, major new versions
(JACK-1.0.0 maybe? :)), etc, I see no harm in cross-posting to all the
three lists.
So in other words, if you really want to see _all_ the announcements,
you should subcsribe to LAA.
Any comments? If no objections, at least I will from now on send non-major
release announcements only to LAA.
why not subscribe LAD and LAU to LAA? then policy will be enforced
automagically, no?
--
Artem Baguinski: http://www.artm.org/
V2_Lab: http://lab.v2.nl/
V2_ Organisation for the Unstable Media: http://www.v2.nl/