9 Aug
2009
9 Aug
'09
9:25 a.m.
On 8/8/2009, "Raymond Martin" <laseray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:59:56 you wrote:
When is the Raymond show moving to the improvisor mailing lists? Not all
of us have the luxury of email filtering and are too simple minded and
undisciplined to continually resist temptation every goddamn hour to see
if our anti-hero is going to admit to ever being wrong.
On 08/09/2009 06:05 AM, Raymond Martin wrote:
That is what is there for now. So lots of people have been complaining about
nothing.
Raymond On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:44:41 drew Roberts
wrote:
Ok, Just to get this straight in my head.
After you decompiled the code and threatened to put the results of your
labour online as a fork which encouraged Bob Keller to finally publish
the code in a public repo you have now taken that code and changed it
just a little bit, given it exactly the same name and are hosting it at
the same location as the official public release? On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick
Shirkey wrote:
> Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork? Is there a guide
> that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for
> making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually
> forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended
> result of your efforts?
Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this
point at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists
is the original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along
with new text documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from
checking either of the projects.)
There is no decompiled source anywhere on the project. It is all code
straight from the original Impro-Visor on SF.