10 Aug
2009
10 Aug
'09
5:44 a.m.
On Sunday 09 August 2009 23:47:17 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:59:29PM +0200, Arnold
Krille wrote:
Ah, okay. So aeolus was a bad example...
Arnold
If aeolus is small that is good. Because that
leaves more memory to cache
the samples (outside of aeolus itself).
The 120 MB includes all precomputed
wavetables, and they
are loaded permanently in memory. There is nothing else to
be cached.