7 Jun
2007
7 Jun
'07
3:27 p.m.
Il giorno gio, 07/06/2007 alle 12.05 +0200, Robin Gareus ha scritto:
Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
Oh well, I didn't notice the 64! :-D
Anyway, keep it up. It's very interesting stuff!
Stefano
Il giorno gio, 07/06/2007 alle 09.20 +0200, Robin
Gareus ha scritto:
indeed - at least it scales linearly with decreasing timesteps ;) - for
guitar a *8 or *16 oversampling is sufficient. ngSpice is clearly is not
suitable to be used as audio-effect; yet it's handy to test&debug
audio-circuits, or even create convolution samples. Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
4 mins? OMG! :-\ Hi,
I read on spicy sound website: "However todays computing power allows to
do so almost in real-time!"... do you think you'll get it real-time?
no,
not any more.
Without oversampling, small circuits run /almost/ in real-time. However
the posted 3 seconds of guitar took almost 4 mins to be processed with
ngSpice simulating at 1s/(64*48k) timesteps.