10 Mar
2004
10 Mar
'04
10:02 a.m.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 01:55:55 +0100, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:22:36AM +0000, Steve Harris
wrote:
There is a formal approval mecahnism, its whatever Richard will bless.
He contacted me off-list: he is still around but hasnt been activily
participating. I'l pass on whtaever we eventually agree on and he will
either send it back with red ink on it or give it the OK.
A variety of non-standard implenentations at this
point would be a very
bad thing, and I *will not* be coerced into supporting some illconceived
extension by fait accompli.
Agreed, and fair enough. The problem is that there is no formal approval
procedure. So a proposal is effectively accepted in some sense when
'a number of' developers is using it ... I'd prefer a more organised approach, but
can't see one immediately.
I dont think there is any subset of LADSPA developers who would trust any
other subset to agree on a sane spec, so no :)
- Steve