Le 24 nov. 08 à 18:35, Jack O'Quin a écrit :
  On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Alex Montgomery
 <apmontgomery(a)gmail.com> wrote:
  I think this kind of tools is a good candidate to
be developed as
 an "in
 server" JACK client. With the dbus based dynamic access of
 available "in
 server" clients installed on a machine, it will be quite easy to
 load/unload
 this kind of tool when needed (Netjack2 uses this model of "in
 server"
 clients). 
 Ok, so Nedko and I got a release out that supports goto/locate MMC
 messages
 and command-line parameters. We're going to switch it over to using
 JACK
 midi instead of ALSA midi next. Should we start thinking about
 making this
 an "in server" client now? Could someone familiar with this stuff
 comment on
 this? 
 
 I recommend making it a normal external client.  That will be easier
 to code and test, and easier to make work with both jack1 and jack2
 servers.
 --
 joq 
Maybe you can structure the code to  have the "parameter parsing" part
clearly separated from "opening/activating the jack client" part. Then
it will be easier to make it as an internal client.
Stephane