Le 24 nov. 08 à 18:35, Jack O'Quin a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Alex Montgomery
<apmontgomery(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think this kind of tools is a good candidate to
be developed as
an "in
server" JACK client. With the dbus based dynamic access of
available "in
server" clients installed on a machine, it will be quite easy to
load/unload
this kind of tool when needed (Netjack2 uses this model of "in
server"
clients).
Ok, so Nedko and I got a release out that supports goto/locate MMC
messages
and command-line parameters. We're going to switch it over to using
JACK
midi instead of ALSA midi next. Should we start thinking about
making this
an "in server" client now? Could someone familiar with this stuff
comment on
this?
I recommend making it a normal external client. That will be easier
to code and test, and easier to make work with both jack1 and jack2
servers.
--
joq
Maybe you can structure the code to have the "parameter parsing" part
clearly separated from "opening/activating the jack client" part. Then
it will be easier to make it as an internal client.
Stephane