17 Dec
2009
17 Dec
'09
10:58 a.m.
Through which API? I not sure I understand audio IO on Vista, with the
concurrent existence of several APIs. Never mind, perhaps this is a
bit OT in a Linux Audio list...
Victor
On 17 Dec 2009, at 14:45, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 17.12.09 09:14, Paul Davis
(paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com) wrote:
And Vista apparently too as it seems.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net
http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
If you
care about more than pro audio, then you want to dynamically
adjust the sleep times based on the requirements of the clients
connected. That means you cannot use fixed sized hardware fragments
anymore, but need to schedule audio more dynamically using system
timers.
This in fact is where most of the complexity in systems such as
PulseAudio stems from.
and before the accusations start flying, this is also how CoreAudio
works on OS X (and even more so in the iPhone "version" of CoreAudio,
which doesn't a lot like CoreAudio at all).