14 Aug
2004
14 Aug
'04
12:14 a.m.
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 21:30, John Check wrote:
On Friday 13 August 2004 04:35 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
I don't think "Great idea, but no one has time to implement it right
now" is blowing someone off. It's a perfectly legitimate response.
Lee
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 16:17, John Check wrote:
Well, what I have is currently implemented as a LADSPA plug in so it already
works with jack.
Even though I'd like to see the theory outside the plug in framework I have
other priorities at the moment. This particular thing is just one piece of a
much bigger puzzle and whenever I see requests for the functionality the
people asking get blown off. On Thursday 12 August 2004 07:11 pm, Dave
Robillard wrote:
No, it's just that I don't think any of the Jack developers have time.
You are welcome to join jackit-devel and start posting patches. Maybe
someone is even working on it already.
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 18:46, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 06:34:44 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > Slightly OT digression: I always thought Jack MIDI was a really
> > good idea - sample accurate, less multi-API hassle, goes everywhere
> > jack goes. Whatever happened to that?
>
> Its hard to get right and aseq works. I'l sure someone will finish it
> sometime.
>
> - Steve
Well, once Jack has MIDI, all we need is a jack-over-ethernet driver,
and the world is ours! :)
Has anybody looked at Nelson P Lago's research and code?
It's crickets and tumbleweeds anytime I've mentioned it.
(Network transparent low latency sample-accurate
cross-platform MIDI
and audio... mmmm...)
NIH I guess.