8 Jan
2003
8 Jan
'03
5:44 p.m.
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 11.49, Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:23:23 -0800, Tim Hockin
wrote:
That doesn't properly represetn how it works though, I would expect
VOICE_ON to map to a new gong instance.
That means you can't strike a vibrating gong again...? Not quite
following here.
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
I dont
think that matters, eg. my favourite exmaple, the gong
synth. If you issue a voice on it will initialise the gong
graph in its stabel state, and when you sned a velocity signal
(or whatever) it will simulate a beater striking it.
I'd expect it to work quite differently. I'd expect it to
initialize a stable state, and whenever a VOICE_ON comes in,
latch the velocity, beater-hardness, and strike coordinates.
Perhaps damping would be a continuous control.
Each new strike would be a VOICE_ON and each new strike would
affect the global graph. Really it is monophonic. Each new
voice inherits state from the prior voice.