26 Jan
2010
26 Jan
'10
5:03 a.m.
Arnold Krille wrote:
[ ... ]
I don't (yet) get the reason for doing this. If the global seed is initiated
with time() it is the same as if each notes seed is initiated with time(), the
numbers are still random beginning from that seed. The only problems I can see
is when the random numbers are correlated resulting with per-note correlation
of for example always the a of the adsr being to short. A problem that is
easily solved when multiple notes get their numbers from the same seed
effectively randomizing the access to that seed and thus overcoming the
correlation...
I can't come up with any better response than ... sounds feasible.