22 Dec
2003
22 Dec
'03
7:54 a.m.
On 21 Dec 2003 21:38:35 -0600
"Jack O'Quin" <joq(a)io.com> wrote:
Hmm, maybe i'll drop andrew an email to see what his thoughts and plans
on the issue are..
Okay :) I will try it..
Thanks for the infos..
--
music: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/9/florianschmidt.htm
On my system, the vanilla 2.6 with preemption is
usable for audio, but
nowhere near as good at low latencies as a properly patched and tuned
2.4 kernel.
Ok, i will give it a shot to see how it goes..
I somewhere read something about merging andrews
LL and the
preemptible patches. Is there any truth to that?
We all hope so. What about the 2.4.x capabilities
"patch"? Will this work on 2.6.x?
Yes, I think it will. But, 2.6 provides a mechanism for doing this as
a kernel module with no patches required. Here is an experimental
module I built based on earlier work done by Torben Hohn...
http://www.joq.us/realtime/realtime-0.0.2.tar.gz