29 Apr
2010
29 Apr
'10
3:36 p.m.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>wrote;wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
This is exactly how I thought it can be done! Great Paul, really nice job
you did!
I think Rui is planning to implement something of that sort as well.
"you can swap qtractor for ardour, or
anything else for that matter and
the
latency will be exactly the same systematic. a client can only process the
results of its own outputs or sends in the _next_ process cycle."
Ha! Rui, that makes sense. Now I think I get it. Indeed.
I wonder if there is an easy way to compensate for this after the
recording took place.
Ardour specifically has a "nudge by period size" (since that is the offset
that results) for precisely this purpose.
--p