29 Jan
2008
29 Jan
'08
3:30 p.m.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:44:46 -0500
Dave Robillard <dave(a)drobilla.net> wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:22 +0000, pete
shorthose wrote:
ok. get back to me when you can justify your
statement with something other then an ad hominem.
cheers,
pete.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:41:39 -0500
Dave Robillard <dave(a)drobilla.net> wrote:
You started it, don't complain when you get
what's coming ;) On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:00 +0000, pete
shorthose wrote:
i'd agree with that entirely. i'm not very
active on this list nor in the community in
general. it's even truer in the wider context.
so, pejorative implications aside, yeah,
that's also a fair statement to make. quite
what it has to do with the matter at hand,
i'm not so sure. virtually nobody cares what you think.
how's that?
Virtually nobody even knows who you are, let
alone what you think. How's that?