8 Jun
2005
8 Jun
'05
7:36 p.m.
I believe the C++ standard specifies that vector<> uses contigous memory and that
&v[0] returns a valid pointer to an array.
Taybin
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Cannam <cannam(a)all-day-breakfast.com>
Sent: Jun 8, 2005 4:41 PM
To: linux-audio-dev(a)music.columbia.edu
Cc: Jussi Laako <jussi.laako(a)pp.inet.fi>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ot] [rant] gcc, you let me down one time too many
On Wednesday 08 Jun 2005 21:35, Jussi Laako wrote:
You can derive a new class from the template and
overload the []
operator to perform exactly same as in C. After compilation the
result is the same no matter if the template or C array is used.
Are you sure this is still true in the gcc world, after they changed
vector from an array to a real class in gcc 3.3 or whenever it was?
Chris