22 Apr
2006
22 Apr
'06
3:30 p.m.
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:19:42PM +0200, Lars Luthman wrote:
Extensions to the metadata, eg. port groups, new kinds of port (assuming
they can still be float *s), additional hints etc.
The clear route is the RDF namespacing mechanism, if someone wants to try
a new extension they can just start using it under thier own namespace,
then it can be added to the core spec if it's popular.
- Steve
Overall I
think this is a much better approach than LADSPA 1.x, it has
usable identifiers, a clear route for extensions without compatibility
problems and each plugin is quite a lot simpler.
What type of extensions are you talking about here, and what is the
clear route?