4 Apr
2012
4 Apr
'12
8:50 p.m.
On 04/04/2012 05:19 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
... On that topic I conclude that Qjackctl doesn't support infra
clients by purpose and that I don't see it happen that there will be
another GUI who does support in the near future.
wait, it's not "by purpose" but just "overlooked" ok?
infra-clients (ie. jack clients unaware of jack-session) and exo-clients
(non-jack applications) are here subjects of a "covenant": the SM in
charge, by its particular implementation, follows some god-knows-what
convention which is NOT bounded by the session protocol (or API) at
all--of course, the suspects are not session-aware to begin with, so any
SM can raise its own "convention" and make up its own party--it's a free
world isn't it? :)
as said, infra/exo-clients support on qjackctl (as a JSM) is "in the
drawer", meaning it's coming out any day soon. so, is there yet another
convention party in the making, you ask?
yep:)
cheers
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc(a)rncbc.org