30 Nov
2007
30 Nov
'07
6:30 a.m.
Lars Luthman <lars.luthman(a)gmail.com> writes:
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 14:55 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov
wrote:
And supplying things to plugins that they should not (and do not) care
about is not confusing? And we assume that plugins would be more than
hosts after all...
--
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
Lars Luthman <lars.luthman(a)gmail.com>
writes:
You could, but there isn't really much to gain from it. The host will
want to keep track of the buffer capacity in some way so those 4 bytes
have to go somewhere, and I think having the same variable mean
different things for input and output buffers makes things more
confusing. On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 05:59 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov
wrote:
Well, port is either input or output, why not use same variable/member
(with appropriate naming)? Also, i doubt we need three "count"
members in Event_Port_Buffer
structure. used_size - number of used events is perfectly fine by
itself. I dont see why plugin should know whether buffer is actually
larger.
It needs to know that for an output buffer.