27 Jan
2010
27 Jan
'10
11:35 a.m.
Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Folderol wrote:
Not quite. Over the last 12 months I've learned that I don't know enough
about how zyn does its maths magic to try to change how it does it too
radically. All I wanted was the same behavior as original zyn, but
simpler code. One day I might get more adventurous, but I'm not there yet.
Cheers.
Hmmm,
Getting identical note and velocity is going to be quite common on
sequencer generated stuff, so I would have thought this was rather
undesirable. While there have been odd occasions when I've wished I
could reliably re-create a pseudo random sequence, in general I would
not want repeated identically created notes to sound exactly the same.
Agreed... but apparently cal /does/ want that. :-)