9 Sep
2003
9 Sep
'03
4:42 p.m.
Well, I'm *half* paying attention...
So we're essentially saying that the momentary thing is a trigger that
operates on 0->positive but not positive->0. I must admit I'm not 100% clear
about the randomisable case from the text.
Do we have example plugins for the two cases?
Cheers,
--Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-audio-dev-admin(a)music.columbia.edu
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin@music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Steve
Harris
Sent: 09 September 2003 08:47
To: linux-audio-dev(a)music.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa diff
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:54:17 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
lets just do it. i think that personally steve harris
should be the
final arbiter of this stuff, after consulting with this list. he's
done more with LADSPA than almost anyone else (perhaps than anyone
else). we've discussed these changes for a while, and IIRC nobody had
any objections.
I'd rather have someone else make the final decision though, for various
reasons - spreading the blame if nothing else :)
Can someone mail Richard off-list? I'm going to be away from email til the
weekend.
- Steve