5 Feb
2008
5 Feb
'08
4:32 a.m.
Am Montag, 4. Februar 2008 schrieb Bob Ham:
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:18 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari
wrote:
If you want 'real' session management, you also want to save the jack-settings
per session. That is not possible as long as lash needs a running jack to
start.
And as more and more users have not only one session per computer but both
multiple sessions per computer and multiple computers per session, that is
another reason to part lash from jack-as-a-dependency
Arnold
--
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your
administrator to do so...
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Why is freeing LASH from being a
libjack client a goal? I fail the see the advantage of D-Bus over e.g.
OSC via UDP or TCP.
The core issue is abstracting the interfaces involved. As long
as it
serves to free LASH from being a libjack client